Design & Reflection
Beyond the classroom: Integrating the ORID model for in-depth reflection and assessment in service-learning
Why this paper matters
Uses the ORID model for structured reflection and assessment.
Evidence reviewed
Design: Qualitative reflection-content analysis
Full-text status: Indexed PDF/full text reviewed
Principal finding
ORID prompts surfaced objective, reflective, interpretive, and decisional dimensions of student learning.
EntrSL interpretation
This paper informs the design or evaluation of service-learning and experiential-learning work. Its findings should be interpreted within the reported design and context, not treated as universal or necessarily causal evidence.
Limitations and boundary conditions
Single-event context and no comparison group.
Scoring rationale
- EntrSL relevance: 4/5. Directness to service-learning, experiential learning, higher education, entrepreneurship, reflection, reciprocity, or institutional practice.
- Evidence quality: 3/5. Based on design transparency, sample or review breadth, analytical fit, and inferential limits.
- Journal standing is separate. OpenAlex two-year mean citedness and h-index are descriptive source metrics and do not increase this paper’s evidence score.
Citation
FK Fadlelmula; SM Qadhi (2024). “Beyond the classroom: Integrating the ORID model for in-depth reflection and assessment in service-learning.” Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090987